International Journal of Nutrition, Pharmacology, Neurological Diseases

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2018  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 79--85

Validation of assessment categories of the patient-generated subjective global assessment tool in classifying the nutritional status of cancer patients


Lohith Mysuru Shivanna, Namratha Pai Kotebagilu, Asna Urooj 
 Department of Studies in Food Science and Nutrition, University of Mysore, Mysuru, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Asna Urooj
Department of studies in Food Science and Nutrition, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysuru - 570 006, Karnataka
India

Background: The patient-generated-subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) tool is considered as the most appropriate nutrition screening tool in oncological setting, since the scoring system enables the patients to be triaged for nutrition intervention. In this study, an attempt was made to determine the precision in classifying patients with cancer as per the Subjective global assessment (SGA) rating or Nutritional Triage recommendations using the PG-SGA tool. Methods: The study was conducted in cancer hospitals of Mysore, Karnataka, India, to recruit 136 cancer patients receiving treatment during a period of 1 year. The PG-SGA tool version 3.22.15 was used for eliciting information and to assess the nutritional status of cancer patients. Results: Among 136 cancer patients, 95.74%, 97.05%, and 74.54% of head-and-neck cancers (HNC), gastrointestinal cancers (GIC), and other cancers (OC), respectively, were malnourished (SGA B + C) according to the SGA categories (SGAC), whereas 93.61%, 97.05%, and 81.81% of HNC, GIC, and OC, respectively, were categorized under severe nutrition risk as per the scored nutritional triage recommendations (SNTR). SGAC had an area under curve (AUC) of 0.961, whereas nutritional triage recommendations had an AUC of 1.0, signifying higher precision of using SNTR to assess the nutritional risk and need for nutritional intervention among cancer patients. Conclusions: Overall, SNTR is more precise in assessing the nutritional status among cancer patients than SGAC and also helps in developing a better nutritional care plan for effective prognosis.


How to cite this article:
Shivanna LM, Kotebagilu NP, Urooj A. Validation of assessment categories of the patient-generated subjective global assessment tool in classifying the nutritional status of cancer patients.Int J Nutr Pharmacol Neurol Dis 2018;8:79-85


How to cite this URL:
Shivanna LM, Kotebagilu NP, Urooj A. Validation of assessment categories of the patient-generated subjective global assessment tool in classifying the nutritional status of cancer patients. Int J Nutr Pharmacol Neurol Dis [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 10 ];8:79-85
Available from: http://www.ijnpnd.com/article.asp?issn=2231-0738;year=2018;volume=8;issue=3;spage=79;epage=85;aulast=Shivanna;type=0